Primary AC Wiring: Difference between revisions

From Collins 30S-1 HF Amplifier
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<p> <span> 500px|thumb|left I am not happy with the charred and crispy wires in the corner near the fuses. I am also not very happy about...")
 
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
[[File:Repaired_ac_fuse_wires.jpg|500px|thumb|right]]
[[File:Repaired_ac_fuse_wires.jpg|500px|thumb|right]]
Ah - much better! Laced, placed, soldered and sleeved. The sleeve was harvested from the removed T202 (above), then split down the side; the idea is to prevent possible wire-chafe on the sharp edge of the fuse panel. I traced the wires before connecting, to ensure that the hot/supply circuit runs to the rear of the fuseholder, for safety when changing.
Ah - much better! Laced, placed, soldered and sleeved. The sleeve was harvested from the removed T202 (above), then split down the side; the idea is to prevent possible wire-chafe on the sharp edge of the fuse panel. I traced the wires before connecting, to ensure that the hot/supply circuit runs to the rear of the fuseholder, for safety when changing.
</span>
</p>
<br clear=all>

<p>
<span>
[[File:230v_jumper.jpg|500px|thumb|left]]
This one is interesting... I did look at the bakelite cover on the AC-input when I first brought it home. At any rate, the jumpers were hidden from view, behind the bakelite cover, and I ASSumed it was good-to-go for 240VAC. Seeing the actual jumpers now, and viewing the schematic while working on the fuses/wiring suggested an error. Deeper digging: the 1964 manul I am using differs from the later 1976 manual, for this connection. The Bakelite printing and my schematic do not jumper 2 to 3&4. But 1976 does.
Connecting 2 to 3&4 would have forced the neutral (mid-point of my 240VAC) onto the center-connection of the two series-connected HV transformer primary windings. T201 never powered-up, but if it had, then this center-connection would have naturally been at the mid-point anyway.

Later, I pulled the fuses, and found one open-circuit. With the Terminal 2 jumpered as-pictured, the 1/2-primary with the open fuse would now act as a third secondary winding, and be live! The "real" secondaries would still be powered, allowing plate/screen to have some supply despite a blown primary fuse :-O

I am not quite sure what to think on this one...
</span>
</span>
</p>
</p>

Revision as of 18:07, 12 August 2020

Charred crispy ac wires.jpg

I am not happy with the charred and crispy wires in the corner near the fuses. I am also not very happy about cutting-back the nicely-marked factory wires. But balancing these two un-happinesses, I'll cut them back ~6" and re-make safe wiring.


Repaired ac fuse wires.jpg

Ah - much better! Laced, placed, soldered and sleeved. The sleeve was harvested from the removed T202 (above), then split down the side; the idea is to prevent possible wire-chafe on the sharp edge of the fuse panel. I traced the wires before connecting, to ensure that the hot/supply circuit runs to the rear of the fuseholder, for safety when changing.


230v jumper.jpg

This one is interesting... I did look at the bakelite cover on the AC-input when I first brought it home. At any rate, the jumpers were hidden from view, behind the bakelite cover, and I ASSumed it was good-to-go for 240VAC. Seeing the actual jumpers now, and viewing the schematic while working on the fuses/wiring suggested an error. Deeper digging: the 1964 manul I am using differs from the later 1976 manual, for this connection. The Bakelite printing and my schematic do not jumper 2 to 3&4. But 1976 does. Connecting 2 to 3&4 would have forced the neutral (mid-point of my 240VAC) onto the center-connection of the two series-connected HV transformer primary windings. T201 never powered-up, but if it had, then this center-connection would have naturally been at the mid-point anyway.

Later, I pulled the fuses, and found one open-circuit. With the Terminal 2 jumpered as-pictured, the 1/2-primary with the open fuse would now act as a third secondary winding, and be live! The "real" secondaries would still be powered, allowing plate/screen to have some supply despite a blown primary fuse :-O

I am not quite sure what to think on this one...